SSD Ranking: The Fastest Solid State Drives

A fast SSD is one of few hardware upgrades that may instantly improve how you experience your PC. This is especially true when switching from a mechanical hard drive, but switching between generations (i.e. from SATA to NVMe/PCIe) may also be noticeable. SSDs are also key components in servers, vastly increasing throughput and efficiency, but we will mainly focus on the fastest consumer-oriented drives here.

This page is not attempting to be the final word on SSD performance – just a (very) simplified guide to some of the best solid state drives on the market. It is primarily based on an average of read and write speeds. However, for real-world performance and durability reasons, we give preference to DRAM-equipped, MLC-based drives.

We will go into some detail later on, but these are the drives that we consider leaders in their respective form factors. They don’t necessarily represent the best value, but are simply some of the speediest storage devices that you can put in a consumer PC today.

Product
Best 2.5-inch SATA
Samsung 860 PRO 512GB V-NAND Solid State Drive (MZ-76P512BW)
Best M.2 NVMe
Samsung 970 PRO 512GB - NVMe PCIe M.2 2280 SSD (MZ-V7P512BW)
Best Add-in Card
Intel Optane SSD 905P Series (960GB) (AIC PCIe x 4 3D XPoint)
Image
Samsung 860 PRO 512GB V-NAND Solid State Drive (MZ-76P512BW)
Samsung 970 PRO 512GB - NVMe PCIe M.2 2280 SSD (MZ-V7P512BW)
Intel Optane SSD 905P Series (960GB) (AIC PCIe x 4 3D XPoint)
Sequential read (max., MB/s)
560 MB/s
3,500 MB/s
2600 MB/s
Sequential write (max., MB/s)
530 MB/s
2,300 MB/s (512 GB)
2200 MB/s
Random read IOPS (4K/QD32)
100,000 IOPS
370,000 IOPS (512 GB)
575,000 IOPS
Random write IOPS (4K/QD32)
90,000 IOPS
500,000 IOPS
550,000 IOPS
Average rating
User reviews
225 Reviews
497 Reviews
8 Reviews
Warranty
5 years
5 years
5 years
Endurance rating
600 TBW (512 GB)
600 TBW (512 GB)
17,520 TBW (960 GB)
Price
from $155.44
from $179.65
$1,129.99
Best 2.5-inch SATA
Product
Samsung 860 PRO 512GB V-NAND Solid State Drive (MZ-76P512BW)
Image
Samsung 860 PRO 512GB V-NAND Solid State Drive (MZ-76P512BW)
Sequential read (max., MB/s)
560 MB/s
Sequential write (max., MB/s)
530 MB/s
Random read IOPS (4K/QD32)
100,000 IOPS
Random write IOPS (4K/QD32)
90,000 IOPS
Average rating
User reviews
225 Reviews
Warranty
5 years
Endurance rating
600 TBW (512 GB)
Price
from $155.44
Best M.2 NVMe
Product
Samsung 970 PRO 512GB - NVMe PCIe M.2 2280 SSD (MZ-V7P512BW)
Image
Samsung 970 PRO 512GB - NVMe PCIe M.2 2280 SSD (MZ-V7P512BW)
Sequential read (max., MB/s)
3,500 MB/s
Sequential write (max., MB/s)
2,300 MB/s (512 GB)
Random read IOPS (4K/QD32)
370,000 IOPS (512 GB)
Random write IOPS (4K/QD32)
500,000 IOPS
Average rating
User reviews
497 Reviews
Warranty
5 years
Endurance rating
600 TBW (512 GB)
Price
from $179.65
Best Add-in Card
Product
Intel Optane SSD 905P Series (960GB) (AIC PCIe x 4 3D XPoint)
Image
Intel Optane SSD 905P Series (960GB) (AIC PCIe x 4 3D XPoint)
Sequential read (max., MB/s)
2600 MB/s
Sequential write (max., MB/s)
2200 MB/s
Random read IOPS (4K/QD32)
575,000 IOPS
Random write IOPS (4K/QD32)
550,000 IOPS
Average rating
User reviews
8 Reviews
Warranty
5 years
Endurance rating
17,520 TBW (960 GB)
Price
$1,129.99

Last update on 2019-05-23 via Amazon Product Advertising API

For our more complete list of SSDs, we’ll start with 2.5″ SATA drives. Today, high-end SATA SSDs are all bandwidth-limited compared to more modern interfaces/protocols such as PCI-express/NVMe (M.2 or add-in card form factors). So if your computer has an available PCIe M.2 slot, that is the type of SSD you should be looking at first.

Table of Contents
Top 10 SATA SSDs
Top 10 M.2 2280 SSDs
Top 10 PCI-Express (add-in card) SSDs

Consumer Drives (2.5-inch SATA, 6 Gbps)

Samsung 860 Pro1. Samsung 860 Pro

Available Capacities: 256GB – 4TB
Interface: SATA III 6Gbps
560MB/s read (256GB)
550MB/s write (256GB)

This list has been maintained for many years now and Samsung has been on top since late 2012, starting with the somewhat legendary 840 Pro. Today you need to move on from the ageing SATA interface to get noticeably better performance, but Samsung hasn’t stopped improving on its flagship SATA product.

The result as of 2019 is the impressive 860 Pro, which not only performs exceptionally well, but has an endurance rating that is at least double that of its already excellent predecessor. And if previous Samsungs are an indication, the 300 TBW (terabytes written) rating for the 256 GB model up to 4,800 TBW for the 4 TB model (all use MLC NAND), might be conservative estimates. This, coupled with a 5-year warranty and great overall performance, makes the 860 Pro look very attractive indeed. If SATA is your only option, that is.

Check prices: Amazon, Newegg, Amazon UK

Reviews: AnandTech, NotebookCheck, Tom’s Hardware

————————————————————————————————————————————————–

mx5002. Crucial MX500

Available Capacities: 250GB – 2TB
Interface: SATA 3 6Gbps
560MB/s read
510MB/s write

Crucial’s MX500 uses TLC NAND and is a more direct competitor to the Samsung 860 EVO than the 860 Pro. That said, it offers great performance at a very attractive price point and is available in capacities up to 2 TB. Like the 860 EVO it is also backed by a 5-year warranty, but its endurance rating is lower than both the 860 Pro and EVO. It starts at 100 TB for the 250 GB model and ranges up to 700 TB for the 2 TB model, which is still more than sufficient for the average user.

The MX500 can compete with the 860 series in many areas, but rarely (if ever) surpass it. However, the price/performance ratio is excellent so this drive is a good choice for most SATA-limited systems.

Check prices: Amazon, Newegg, Amazon UK

Reviews: AnandTech, Guru3D

————————————————————————————————————————————————–

Samsung 850 Pro3. Samsung 850 Pro

Available Capacities: 128GB – 1TB
Interface: SATA III 6Gbps
550MB/s read (256GB)
520MB/s write (256GB)

The 860 Pro’s predecessor is still an excellent drive, but due to pricing and availability it is probably no longer the best option, but still good if you can find it at the right price. The 850 Pro series uses its own MEX controller in combination with 3D NAND (V-NAND) like its successor, which increases density without compromising performance. And it’s still ahead of today’s competition in many areas.

Check prices: Amazon, Newegg, Amazon UK

————————————————————————————————————————————————–

sandisk extreme pro4. SanDisk Extreme Pro

Available Capacities: 240GB – 960GB
Interface: SATA 3 6Gbps
550MB/s read
520MB/s write

SanDisk’s Extreme Pro is a direct successor to the Extreme II. Just like its predecessor the drive lives up to the expectations implied in the model name. It is slightly ahead of the Extreme II in most areas with sequential read speeds of 550 MB/s and write speeds of 520 MB/s (4K random read/write 100K/90K IOPS), although you will hardly notice the difference in everyday tasks.

More importantly though, SanDisk is confident enough to offer a 10-year warranty with the Extreme Pro – a unique offer in the consumer (or prosumer) segment. The 19nm MLC NAND is allegedly good for writing 22 GB of data per day for 10 years. Consequently, when this drive finally wears out in the average system built today, the SATA interface will be long since obsolete. The Extreme Pro is rather old by now, but then again so is the SATA interface and the drive should definitely be on your short list when evaluating high-end SATA 6 Gbps drives.

Check prices: Amazon, Newegg, Amazon UK

Reviews: AnandTech, TweakTown

————————————————————————————————————————————————–

adata su9005. ADATA Ultimate SU900

Available Capacities: 256GB – 2TB
Interface: SATA 3 6Gbps
560MB/s read
525MB/s write

Taiwanese manufacturer ADATA may have a smaller marketing budget compared to tech giants such as Samsung and SanDisk, but it’s a company known for putting out well-performing, reliable products. The SU900 is perhaps not on par with the speediest SATA drives, but should be quick enough for most. Neither should endurance be an issue, since it uses MLC (3D) NAND and ships with a 5-year warranty.

Check prices: Amazon, Newegg, Amazon UK

Reviews: Storagereview

————————————————————————————————————————————————–

6. Samsung 860 EVO

Available Capacities: 250GB – 4TB
550MB/s read
520MB/s write

The 860 EVO is Samsung’s follow-up of its incredibly successful 850 EVO. Now the difference between these two will be very slim due to the aforementioned interface constraints, but that matters little – the 860 EVO still replaces its predecessor in this price range. And it will still be a great choice given Samsung’s track record.

It performs very well considering it’s a TLC-based SSD. Moreover it offers excellent endurance numbers at precisely half those of the 860 Pro at equivalent capacities (which is still much better than most competitors), as well as a 5-year warranty.

Check prices: Amazon, Newegg, Amazon UK

Reviews: Tom’s Hardware

————————————————————————————————————————————————–

Neutron XT7. OCZ Vector 180

Available Capacities: 120GB – 960GB
550MB/s read
530MB/s write

As you may have noticed, there are plenty of older products in this list of SATA drives. The reason is something of a shortage of new SATA SSDs in the high-end (as in MLC) segment. So even though the Toshiba OCZ Vector 180 was released in 2015, it’s still a viable option in 2019.

The Vector 180 uses 19nm Toshiba MLC NAND in combination with an OCZ Barefoot controller (formerly Indilinx). It is not quite on par with Samsung’s top drives in terms of performance, but it’s close enough. Also, the warranty is a very attractive five years or 50GB of writes per day.

Check prices: Amazon, Amazon UK

Reviews: Bit-tech

————————————————————————————————————————————————–

ssd3708. Transcend SSD370

Available Capacities: 120GB – 480GB
Interface: SATA 3 6GBps
560MB/s read (256GB and up)
460MB/s write (512GB and up)

The SSD370 uses a Transcend TS6500 controller (a rebranded Silicon Motion SM2246EN controller) with Micron 128Gbit 20nm MLC NAND. The random 4KB read reaches 75K IOPS and the random 4KB write goes up to 75K IOPS as well. Its incompressible sequential read performance is excellent, while write performance is not as great overall. However, the drive has other advantages than pure speed.

Transcend bundles it with a custom firmware which enables encryption. While DevSleep is supported, slumber power modes, particularly HIPM and DIPM, are not. The drive comes with a 3.5″ desktop adapter for older machines, as well the cloning utility SSD Scope. It also features “StaticDataRefresh”, which is similar to what other drives do to correct data errors due to cell degradation.

Check prices: Amazon, Newegg, Amazon UK

Reviews: PCWorld, TomsHardware.com

————————————————————————————————————————————————–

sandisk-extreme-ii9. SanDisk Extreme II

Available Capacities: 120GB – 480GB
Interface: SATA 3 6Gbps
550MB/s read
510MB/s write

The Extreme II from Flash storage-giant SanDisk delivers excellent performance at a reasonable price point. It’s a predecessor to the Extreme Pro (see above), and likewise pretty old but still going strong as of 2016. Its sequential read speeds of 550 MB/s and write speeds of 510 MB/s are complemented by very good random read/write figures as well (95K/78K IOPS).

SanDisk uses a controller from Marvell in this particular line of SSDs – a chip with the fanciful designation 88SS9187 (also known as Monet) – with SanDisk’s own firmware and 19nm eX2 ABL MLC NAND (also from SanDisk), which makes for a particularly long-lasting combination according to several reports.

Check prices: Amazon, Newegg, Amazon UK

Reviews: HotHardware, AnandTech

————————————————————————————————————————————————–

Adata sp92010. ADATA Premier Pro SP 920

Available Capacities: 128GB – 1TB
Interface: SATA 3 6Gbps
560 MB/s read (512 GB/1 TB)
500 MB/s write (512 GB/1 TB)

Another ageing but still excellent drive; here Adata uses a Marvell controller the designation 88SS9189. This is combined with synchronous 20m MLC NAND from Micron, which results in excellent performance in the higher-capacity variants of the SP 920. The drive is available in capacities ranging from 128 GB all the way up to 1 TB, with the 512 GB and 1 TB models offering the best performance (and most likely durability).

It is important to note that there’s a large reduction in sequential write performance in the lower-capacity variants: Sequential writes drop to 360 MB/s in the 256 GB model and a mere 180 MB/s in the 128 GB model. 4K read/write IOPS also take a hit, particularly in the 128 GB version of the SP 920. Consequently, we award the spot in the ranking to the 512GB/1TB models only.

Check prices: Amazon, Newegg, Amazon UK

————————————————————————————————————————————————–

M.2 Drives (2280/2260)

Update: Check out our new, up-to-date listing of the best M.2 SSDs here.

970 Pro

1. Samsung 970 Pro

Interface: PCIe Gen3 x4 NVMe
Available Capacities: 512GB, 1,024GB
3500MB/s read
2300MB/s write

If you want top performance and are willing to pay a bit more for it, then the Samsung 970 Pro is about as good as it gets in this form factor. Although in terms of everyday user experience, you would probably never be able to tell the difference between this an any of the other top contenders in this segment.

But an SSD is the sum of its parts, nothing more and nothing less. What sets the 970 Pro apart from many of its competitors (including the 970 EVO) is that it uses higher-quality MLC NAND, and will, therefore, last longer than its more affordable TLC counterparts. The endurance rating is 600 TBW (twice that of the comparable EVO) or five years (same as the EVO)

It will also perform better and more consistently thanks to the better NAND. This is particularly noticeable in the random write area, with 500,000 IOPS (4K, QD32) in both available capacities.

Check prices: Amazon, Newegg, Amazon UK

Reviews: StorageReview, TweakTown

————————————————————————————————————————————————–
970 EVO Plus

2. Samsung 970 EVO Plus

Interface: PCIe Gen3 x4 NVMe
Available Capacities: 250 GB, 500 GB, 1 TB
3500MB/s read
3300MB/s write

Instead of launching an entirely new model, Samsung updated its popular 970 EVO lineup (which is still available) with the 970 EVO in 2019. As the name implies, it is basically an improved version of the same SSD, using the same controller but denser, 96-layer TLC NAND and some additional tweaks. The improvements are particularly noticeable in term of write performance. Sequential transfer rates are up from 2,500 MB/s to 3,300 MB/s, meaning that it outperforms the 970 PRO in some cases.

According to Samsung, random write performance with the 970 EVO Plus has been improved by as much as 57% compared to the previous EVO.

Check prices: Amazon, Newegg, Amazon UK

————————————————————————————————————————————————–

960 Pro

3. Samsung 960 Pro

Interface: PCIe Gen3 x4 NVMe
Available Capacities: 512 GB, 1 TB, 2 TB
3500MB/s read
2100MB/s write

While the 970 Pro was an improvement, Samsung’s 960 pro is still a blazing-fast SSD. Like its successor, this m.2 drive supports 4 lanes of PCIe and uses NVMe for maximum bandwidth utilization and increased throughput. It uses Samsung’s own Polaris controller in combination with Samsung MLC V-NAND.

The 960 Pro supports TGC Opal and AES 256-bit data encryption. In the random read/write area, it delivers up to 440K IOPS for 4KB (QD32) random read and 330K IOPS for random writes (also 4KB/QD32). Reduce the queue depth to 1 and it still reaches an impressive 14K IOPS/50K IOPS read/write. These numbers, by the way, apply to the higher-capacity drives, while the 512 GB model is slightly slower.

Samsung offers a 5-year warranty with the 960 Pro as well as impressive endurance ratings of 1200 TB for the 2 TB model, 800 TB for the 1 TB drive and 400 TB for the 512 GB version – higher numbers than the 970 EVO but lower than the Pro.

Check prices: Amazon, Newegg, Amazon UK

Reviews: AnandTech, ArsTechnica, Guru3D

————————————————————————————————————————————————–

970 EVO

4. Samsung 970 EVO

Interface: PCIe Gen3 x4 NVMe
Available Capacities: 512 GB, 1 TB, 2 TB
3400MB/s read
2300MB/s write

As usual, Samsung’s EVO series offers a feature set that is almost on par with its more expensive Pro counterpart but uses cheaper TLC NAND in combination with the same Phoenix controller. For most of us, the price/performance equation is more important than pure performance, and that makes the 970 EVO a solid option. Again, the difference between the top drives in the NVMe PCI-express segment will not be noticeable for most users.

The 970 EVO is actually, on paper, slightly faster than the 960 Pro in some areas, but it’s slower in a few others due to the TLC NAND.

Check prices: Amazon, Newegg, Amazon UK

Reviews: StorageReivew, TweakTown

————————————————————————————————————————————————–

sx8200 pro

5. ADATA XPG SX8200 Pro

Interface: PCIe Gen3 x4 NVMe
Available Capacities: 256GB to 1TB
3200MB/s read (480GB)
1700MB/s write (480GB)

Unlike Samsung’s lineup, ADATA’s ‘Pro’ designation does not imply that it’s an MLC drive. It instead uses now-common 64-layer 3D TLC NAND, meaning that – like many similar drives – the listed sequential read and write speeds do not paint the whole picture. These drives normally use an SLC cache keep transfer speeds up, but only until the cache is full.

That doesn’t mean that the SX8200 Pro is not a fast drive, because it is. It surpasses the Samsung 970 EVO in certain areas, with the help of a Silicon Motion SM2262 controller and a DRAM buffer. The warranty is five years and the TBW ratings start at 160 TBW for the 256GB model, which doubles in line with the capacities.

Check prices: Amazon, Newegg, Amazon UK

Reviews: TweakTown

————————————————————————————————————————————————–

960 Evo

6. Samsung 960 Evo

Interface: PCIe Gen3 x4 NVMe
Available Capacities: 250 GB, 500 TB, 1 TB
3200MB/s read
1900MB/s write (1 TB)

One of the strongest competitors to the other TLC-based m.2 SSD – including the 970 EVO – is Samsung’s 960 Evo, which is still available. It is not quite as fast as the new model, although the difference should be small enough not to be noticeable in everyday usage scenarios.

Its durability rating is unsurprisingly lower than the Pro variant, down from 400 TB to 200 TB for the popular 500 GB capacity. The warranty is also reduced from 5 to 3 years. This won’t be a problem for the vast majority of the intended users, but worth keeping in mind.

In terms of raw performance, the 960 Evo is rated at up to 380K/360K IOPS random read/writes (compared to 440K/360K for the Pro) in the largest capacities (QD32).

In short: This is a good choice as the price/performance ratio is very attractive at this point – and if you don’t plan to write copious amounts of data to it too often.

Check prices: Amazon, Newegg, Amazon UK

Reviews: StorageReview, HotHardware, AnandTech

————————————————————————————————————————————————–

800P

7. Intel Optane SSD 800P

Interface: PCIe Gen3 x2 NVMe
Available Capacities: 58GB, 118TB
1450MB/s read
640MB/s write (1 TB)

This drive is very difficult to categorize as it differs considerably from all of its competitors in more ways than one. While the sequential transfer rates may seem modest, the Optane 800P outperforms Samsungs Pro-series drives in many areas. This might compensate for the comparatively tiny capacities and the high cost, at least in specific use cases.

The reason why it’s so different is that the Optane doesn’t even use NAND Flash. Instead, it’s equipped with Intel’s own 3D X-Point memory, which has other characteristics, making it partly more similar to DRAM.

But at the end of the day, the average PC builder will have to compare NAND and 3D X-Point in terms of price/performance/capacity, and then the 800P may be a tough sell. An exception might be workstation users who put their drives through a heavy load on a daily basis, because no competitor offers the same endurance: 1.7 to 3.4 full drive writes per day for the duration of the 5-year warranty period.

Check prices: Amazon, Newegg, Amazon UK

Reviews: StorageReview, AnandTech

————————————————————————————————————————————————–

we black m28. WD Black 2018

Interface: PCIe Gen2 x4 M.2
Available Capacities: 250GB, 500GB, 1TB
3400MB/s read (500GB)
2500MB/s write (500GB)

Western Digital has been a giant in the storage industry for decades, but only recently started catching up in the SSD market following the company’s acquisition of SanDisk.

This drive uses SanDisk’s TLC flash, meaning it will not fully compete with high-end MLC-based SSDs in the same segment. Its sequential transfer rates are however very high, although it differs quite a bit between capacities. This is particularly true for the drive’s listed write speed, where the 250 GB drive (1600 MB/s) is considerably slower than the 1TB variation (2800 MB/s).

The random figures also vary a great deal by capacity, ranging from 170,000 IOPS write (250GB) to 400,000 IOPS write (1TB).

WD offers a 5-year warranty with these drives and the TBW rating is up to 600 TBW. Note that there’s an older version of this drive available, with the same name but lesser performance and endurance ratings.

Check prices: Amazon, Newegg, Amazon UK

Reviews: AnandTech

————————————————————————————————————————————————–

760p9. Intel SSD 760p

Interface: PCIe Gen2 x4 M.2
Available Capacities: 128GB – 2TB
3230MB/s read (512GB)
1625MB/s write (512GB)

You can usually trust Intel when it comes to PC parts although the chip giant hasn’t been able to keep up with Samsung in the consumer segment recently. This drive is an attempt to change that (again), and so Intel has put together this appealing TLC-based SSD with its own NAND and a custom Silicon Motion controller.

As is often the case, there is a considerable performance difference between the lowest-capacity (128GB) drive and the roomier ones. But it’s a bit more pronounced in this case, with the 128GB model’s sequential transfer rates being 1640/650 MB/s (read/write), compared to 3230/1625 MB/s for the 512 GB capacity.

That said, it seems to be a very capable drive, backed by a 5-year warranty and acceptable endurance ratings (288 TBW for the 512GB model).

Check prices: Amazon, Newegg, Amazon UK

————————————————————————————————————————————————–

hyperx m210. Kingston HyperX Predator

Interface: PCIe Gen2 x4 M.2
Available Capacities: 240 GB – 480 GB
1400MB/s read (480GB)
1000MB/s write (480GB)

While not as speedy as Samsung’s flagship, the Predator is still way faster than your standard SATA SSD. It’s flexible enough to use with every board thanks to the on-board OROM.

The HyperX Predator uses a Marvell 88SS9293 controller and Toshiba A19 MLC NAND. It can go up to 160K IOPS for 4KB random read and 119K IOPS for 4KB random write. Its mean time between failures is 1,000,000 hours. It also comes with a PCIe bracket since it’s aimed at desktop users who wish to upgrade. Finally, the warranty for this drive is 3 years.

According to some reports, it delivers lower battery life versus other Samsung drives, which makes it a less than ideal choice for laptops.

Check prices: Amazon, Newegg, Amazon UK

————————————————————————————————————————————————–
plextor m6e

11. Plextor M6e

Interface: PCIe Gen2 x2 M.2
Available Capacities: 128 GB – 512 GB
770MB/s read
625MB/s write (512GB)

Unlike our previous entries, the M6e is only operating on 2 PCIe lanes. That’s in part because this was the first m.2 drive of its kind. The M6e uses Toshiba Toggle MLC NAND and a Marvell 88SS9183 controller. It can go as high as 105K IOPS for 4KB random read and 100K IOPS for 4KB random write.

Some of its features include “PlexVault” (for securing data), “PlexCompressor” (smart compression), “PlexTurbo” (caching), “TrueSpeed” (speed optimization) and “True Protect” (error checking). It comes with a respectable 5-year warranty.

Check prices: Amazon, Newegg, Amazon UK

————————————————————————————————————————————————–
BP 5 eco

12. MyDigitalSSD Bullet Proof 5 Eco

Interface: M.2
Available Capacities:120 GB – 960 GB
565MB/s read
545MB/s write

This drive contains a Phison S10 PS3110 controller and Toshiba TLC Toggle NAND flash. The Bullet Proof 5 Eco features SMART, RAID and TRIM support. It also uses ECC and sudden power-off recovery. The mean time between failures for this drive is 1,000,000 hours and has a 3-year warranty.

Check prices: Amazon, Newegg

————————————————————————————————————————————————–

m60013. Micron M600

Interface: SATA 600 M.2
Available Capacities: 50GB – 200GB
560MB/s read
510MB/s write (256GB up)

The M600 uses a Marvell 88SS9189 controller and Micron 16nm MLC NAND. The drive is rated at 100K IOPS for 4KB random read and 88K IOPS for 4KB random write.

It features dynamic write acceleration and performance is optimized for environments where writes happen in sporadic bursts, which is how most computing is done in consumer hardware. The M600 supports RAID, adaptive thermal monitoring, TRIM, SMART, and DevSleep. It is also TCG Opal-compliant and uses 256-bit AES self-encryption. Lastly, the drive features power-loss data protection and supports the Windows eDrive standard.

Check prices: Amazon, Newegg, Amazon UK

————————————————————————————————————————————————–

mts80014. Transcend MTS800

Interface: M.2
Available Capacities: 32GB – 1TB
560MB/s read
460MB/s write

Transcend has always been inclusive when it comes to their drives, selling even smaller storage capacities to cater to budget-conscious consumers. The MTS800 goes up to 75K IOPS for both 4KB random read and 4KB random write.

If features SMART, TRIM, NCQ command, and DevSleep. Another useful feature is the hardware trigger that helps for quick data wipe if needed as well as a manual write protect.

To combat data corruption that’s usually the bane of solid state drives like these, the drive has “StaticDataRefresh” Technology to restore charge levels to the NAND cells as errors increase. It also uses Intel Smart Response Technology (ISRT) to enable the disk as an intermediary between your hard drive and the system memory for faster performance without added configuration.

Check prices: Amazon, Newegg, Amazon UK

————————————————————————————————————————————————–

ignite15. Patriot Ignite

Interface: M.2
Available Capacities: 240 GB – 960 GB
560MB/s read
320MB/s write

The Ignite m.2 drive carries the Phison S10 controller with MLC NAND. It includes features like Smart ECC, Smart Refresh, Guaranteed Flush Technology, and ECC Recovery. There’s also TRIM support and end-to-end data path protection for your files, as well as advanced wear-leveling and advanced garbage collection for better performance over longer periods of use.

It can use native command queueing and has a mean time between failure of 2,000,000 hours and a 3- year warranty. The 4KB random read for this drive is 90K IOPS and 4KB random write of up to 77K IOPS.

Check prices: Amazon, Newegg, Amazon UK

————————————————————————————————————————————————–

mx20016. Crucial MX200

Interface: M.2
Available Capacities: 250 GB – 500 GB
555MB/s read
500MB/s write

This mx200 uses a Marvell controller as well as 16nm 128Gbit MLC NAND made by its parent company Micron. Its controller is a Marvell 88SS9189. The 4KB random read is rated at 100K IOPS and the 4KB random write is 87K IOPS.

It features TCG Opal encryption, support for Windows eDrive, DevSleep and Dynamic Write Acceleration, Crucial’s implementation of SLC caching. It also supports RAIN which writes data to multiple cells, kind of like RAID but for NAND. The drive lasts up to 320 full drive writes and has a 3-year warranty from the manufacturer.

Check prices: Amazon, Newegg, Amazon UK

————————————————————————————————————————————————–

Top 10 PCI Express Card SSDs (Bootable)

905p1. Intel Optane SSD 905P

Interface: PCIe NVMe 3.0 x4
Form Factor: Add-in Card, HHHL (CEM 3.0)
Available Capacities: 480GB, 960 and 1.5TB
Up to 2600MB/s read
Up to 2200MB/s write
Random 4K Write: Up to 550K IOPS

Considering the overall performance scores that this drive racks up across various reviews, this may well be the fastest SSD in the world at this time. And it also has an endurance rating in a league of its own compared to other drives aimed at not-necessarily-professional users.

However, for the average user – including most professionals – this drive is probably overkill. But if you really want the best-performing drive, you’ll be happy to learn that Intel has introduced a new endurance metric for it known as PBW, or petabytes written.

The 960 GB capacity has a PBW rating of 17.52, meaning you can write about 17.5 million GB to it before it wears down. Intel’s 3D Xpoint memory, which appears to be practically invincible, is the reason why this drive is difficult to compare to regular NAND-based SSDs.

Check prices: Amazon, Amazon UK, Newegg

Reviews: TweakTown

————————————————————————————————————————————————–

900p2. Intel Optane SSD 900P Series

Interface: PCIe NVMe 3.0 x4
Form Factor: Add-in Card, HHHL (CEM 3.0)
Available Capacities: 280GB and 480GB
Up to 2500MB/s read
Up to 2000MB/s write
Random 4K Write: Up to 500K IOPS

Only slightly behind its successor is the 950p’s predecessor in Intel’s Optane 900p-series. These drives also use 3D Xpoint memory, and while it may not show in the drives’ raw sequential transfer performance, it’s a very impressive SSD.

As is the endurance rating, which is 10 full drive writes per day for 5 years. Such characteristics mean that it’s well suited not only for enthusiast builds but also for heavy-duty workstations.

Check prices: Amazon, Amazon UK, Newegg

Reviews: HotHardware

————————————————————————————————————————————————–

nx5003. Corsair Neutron NX500

Interface: PCIe NVMe 3.0 x4
Form Factor: Add-in Card, HHHL
Available Capacities: 400GB, 800GB and 1600GB
Up to 3000MB/s read
Up to 2500MB/s write
Random 4K Write: Up to 270K IOPS

In spite of its higher theoretical maxim transfer rates (measured with ATTO, according to Corsair), we will rank the Neutron NX500 from Corsair below the Optane 900p because real-world performance is consistently below according to the reviews we’ve seen (links below). It’s apparently tough to compete with 3D Xpoint, but that doesn’t mean that the NX500 is a low-end product. Among the small number of consumer-oriented PCIe drives currently available in the add-in card form factor, it’s an attractive option given that the price point is reasonable compared to the Optane.

Check prices: Amazon, Amazon UK, Newegg

Reviews: AnandTech, Tom’s Hardware

————————————————————————————————————————————————–

m8pe4. Plextor M8Pe

Interface: PCIe NVMe 3.0 x4
Form Factor: Add-in Card, HHHL
Available Capacities: 128GB, 256GB, 512GB and 1TB
Up to 2000MB/s read
Up to 1400MB/s write
Random 4K Write: Up to 240K IOPS

Thanks to the now-ubiquitous M.2 slot, large PCIe add-in cards, or AIC, have become increasingly rare outside of the enterprise segment. Another one of a mere handful of manufacturers who still make drives for the form factor is Plextor.

The drive series with the less-than-inspiring name M8Pe uses 15nm Toshiba MLC NAND and is available in both M.2 and AIC form factors. There is also a newer version of the drive known as M8Se that uses less durable TLC NAND.

In terms of performance, the M8Pe should have no problems competing with mainstream M.2 drives, making it a potentially cost-effective solution if an AIC is what you need.

Check prices: Amazon, Amazon UK, Newegg
————————————————————————————————————————————————–

5. OCZ RevoDrive 350

Interface: PCI Express 2.0 x 8
Available Capacities: 240GB – 960GB
1800MB/s read
1700MB/s write
Random 4K Writes: Up to 140K IOPS

The original RevoDrive was released well before the M.2 form factor took off, and was considered exceptionally fast at the time. However, now that it’s not just competing with SATA drives, the RevoDrive will only appeal to a much smaller market.

There have been several SSDs in the series, but the RevoDrive 350 is the only one that’s more widely available (and it’s not particularly new).

————————————————————————————————————————————————–

We’ve tried our best to compile the most comprehensive list of SSDs available and used this to create the lists you see above. Since there are new drives launched each month, we will update our list and ratings regularly. Also, if you think we’ve omitted something or need correction, don’t hesitate to leave a comment or contact us.

SSD endurance: MTBF or TBW?

MTBF figures are not overly relevant when it comes to SSDs, which have no mechanical parts that are prone to failure. Instead, a solid state drive’s life span is mainly determined by the number of times each block of cells can be written to before it wears out. SLC (single-level cell) NAND is more durable than MLC (multi-level cell), which in turn is more durable than TLC (triple-level cell) NAND. Since 2018, QLC drives are also available. Other than endurance, additional bits per cell also affects performance negatively. Most consumer-oriented drives in 2019 use affordable TLC memory, whereas MLC is used in products aimed at the enthusiast or professional markets.

Production Processes

Unlike other parts such as a CPU/GPU, a smaller production process as measured in nanometers (nm), is not a strong selling point as it results in lower durability, all other things equal. However, for the average home or office user, durability is rarely an issue, since any SSD will most likely outlive the rest of the computer by a wide margin. Just don’t rely on low-cost drives with cheap NAND in a server or other environment with a high continuous workload

74 Comments
  1. Quite an informative review.
    The quality of reviews have considerably increased since the first ones. Now they are realistic, and it is good, because in many sources all you can find is an annoying advertisement packing consumers with apparently deceiving information.
    The manufacturers are not in a hurry to produce something revolutionary new and ready as a final, standards-compliant, reliable product, most of the time they are going for profit, which delays the introduction of new technologies for many years. Server market may be considered an exception though, because deceiving the customers doesn’t work well there.
    This tendency is true for many other “modern” retail customer products now. For example, LED LCDs, which in fact have lower full spectrum reproduction range (yes, much lower than those with CCFL backlight) and some issues with flickering, but higher visual color reproduction range (just for eyes though).

  2. On the side note, you made it a bit tricky to pick up a desired avatar 😉

  3. Thanks vt! Actually a ton of research has gone into this from my colleague Glenn who wrote the piece and we plan to update it regularly. Hopefully it stays fresh for a couple of weeks… It’s a bit opportunistically based on “top speed” only, but that seemed logical considering this site’s name.

    And yes, something has to be done about those avatars 🙂

  4. Why aren’t the OCZ RevoDrive X2 or the original one listed on this site?

    http://www.ocztechnology.com/products/solid-state-drives/pci-express/enthusiast.html

  5. @CMW: Yes, the RevoDrive X2 could probably be listed as drive #11 with 740/720MB/s reads/writes

  6. So many SSDs missing from this list it makes it obsolete from the get go..

  7. @Simon: That’s because the “get go” was a couple of months ago. It’s been updated.

  8. I’m still waiting for SLC NAND prices to go down, but they (the manufacturers) aren’t willing to cut them, while SLC chips have only 2x lower capacity.
    Spot price for 32 GBit MLC NAND – 5.41 $
    Spot price for 16 Gbit SLC NAND – 13.12 $

    That means that SLC NAND chips are unreasonably almost 2.42x more expensive than they could be. The manufacturers are way too greedy …

    Also, at this rate they are going to intentionally hinder more advanced SSD products with MRAM or FeRAM or other similar technology – just to get back the money and profit from their investments into NAND. That most likely means another 5 year without any good replacement to NAND. And no alternate to NAND SLC solutions, with the exception of DRAM SSDs, which are, of course, have greater potential for random I/O and bandwidth than any NAND product.

  9. Just wondering… Why are none of the SSD’s that OWC makes not included here?

    JQ

  10. > The manufacturers are way too greedy …

    Welcome to capitalism! Enough people are willing to pay more so of course they’re going to charge as much as possible. This is always how the storage market goes.

    For example, it is pointless to have two different interfaces – SAS and SATA. Yet this is what allows them to stick it harder to people who will pay a lot more for just a little more speed. Same thing going all the way back to the early SCSI/IDE days.

  11. Does mushkin not even make the top 10? The numbers on their Chronos look good.

  12. Nice listing but its credibility suffers. I will never place Mushkin Chronos that high. Mushkin Chronos will never beat the OCZ Vertex 3 Max IOPS in benchmarks. There are lots of benchmarking sites that show that the numbers on Mushkin Chronos are the fake ones. OCZ is that low on the list only because they are telling the real numbers. The price of Mushkin is really low when comparing to the others and that makes is interesting product. But the failing performance numbers tell something about the manufacturers strategy…

    http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/forum/hardware-canucks-reviews/45871-mushkin-chronos-deluxe-120gb-ssd-review-12.html

    http://thessdreview.com/our-reviews/mushkin-chronos-deluxe-240gb-sata-3-ssd-review-pcmark-vantage-comparison-and-the-verdict/

    Reliable listing by performance should always base on the independent benchmarking not the numbers the manufacturers are telling.

  13. Great review of drives…
    manufacturer’s too greedy? Being a person who works for one the worlds largest companies and hearing this all the time, its just a stupid comment. People don’t realize the dollars spent and R&D in order to increase drive speeds, etc.. prices will come down, just give the companys time to make back some of their money. If you want a cheap SSD , buy a first gen drive, that the companies have droped the price because they are out of the “red”.

  14. “Being a person who works for one the worlds largest companies and hearing this all the time, its just a stupid comment.”
    Stupid for those who make money on that ? Maybe. But not for customers. There is no excuse for overblown prices on SLC memory chips, there is no excuse for hindering the progressive technologies just to make the most profit of the old and inefficient ones.

  15. Also, if you read the other comments, I already revealed the lies and deception all over the retail non-server SSD market, and I have really a lot of other facts worth mentioning regarding your REALLY stupid comment.

  16. @maggou,
    Thanks for the links. It certainly looks like a revision of the list is needed. I would personally not interpret the numbers as fake though, they are probably correct in synthetic benchmarks under optimal conditions. On the other hand, the Vertex 3 has had its share of firmware issues, but it is starting to look more and more solid and mature.

  17. funny how you missed the m4 with 0009 firmware cause its the fastest drive

  18. >>JimQ Said:
    Just wondering… Why are none of the SSD’s that OWC makes not included here?
    JQ
    —–
    Perhaps because OWC doesn’t make anything at all, they just relabel the very stuff you are seeing above. Also because you most likely work there.

  19. TO THE MODERATOR

    Don’t be a money hungry bunch of pigs — seriously. OWC will pay you to review their crap, and tie an advertising contract to it.

    That’s no reason to review what you know is a relabeled product. There isn’t anything that’s “made to order” – assuming you don’t count a package type and the length of a cable!!

    Just review any of his other reviews — and then look at the amount of advertising he has on each of those, especially the dedicated Mac sites — where he lets those people keep product and takes out yearly contracts.

    That removes ALL the integrity that you are trying to establish. Don’t fall for that kind of scam – you’ll become as unworthy as the rest who do the same thing, vs. businesses that are growing on their own innovation, rather than by slime-ball tactics that also include pressure to remove posts made by those who criticize their customer service or sometimes crap products.

    They have some good stuff, and they also deceive where it is convenient. Don’t be part of that crowd that helps out a company that does that sort of thing. In the future it will become clear that you don’t want any association with this group. “Do No Evil” is not part of their mantra.

  20. @Bubu: Thanks for the tips! However, the RAM drives you link to are volatile and belong in their own separate category IMO.

  21. How is the Vertex 3 faster than the Mushkin? According to your dates the Mushkin has 10MB/s faster readrates or am I missing something? Would be great to know how you rate them exactly as I am about to purchase one of them…

  22. fusionIO’s ioDrive Octal is now available in 10.24tb
    http://www.fusionio.com/platforms/iodrive-octal/

  23. Probably a bit off-topic – http://forums.anandtech.com/showthread.php?t=2198385
    It is about AMD processors. They didn’t mention the fact that JFAMD DID know about the performance problems. I asked him several questions under different accounts, and the differences in his answers (lies) unambiguously pointed out the fact that he did know about the IPC problems, moreover he did know about the actual benchmarks and that it wouldn’t even meet the IPC of the older Intel processors. That was fun getting reaction out of him and getting the truth that way (he plainly reacted offensively at correct guesses, so by varying the questions and information given to him and watching his anger one could easily figure the exact benchmarks numbers with amazingly high precision).

  24. But well, he did one good thing – he led hundreds of PR idiots alongside, who have got their “expert” and “trustworthy” accounts compromised.

  25. @Alan: The difference between the SF-2281 drives is marginal, and the quoted speeds are not to be taken as gospel. In real-world tests the Vertex 3 Max IOPS generally beat most of the competition (MLC in the same form factor). But you have a point, this listing is due for an update.

  26. vt: Interesting thread. It’s hard to defend the indefensible…

  27. It’s a good list – but the speed is Sequential read and writes? Of course it’s the thing the manufacturers publish as they are impressive to see – in real use though Random read and writes are more important to the average user – IOPS more important in the Enterprise market…

  28. How about including the NEW OWC Mercury extreme Pro 6g 240gb with SANDFORCE 2282. I think they are the only company using this controller and tests have shown this is a very fast drive.

  29. […] may be priced in dollars but the spec remains the same: SSD Ranking: The Fastest Solid State Drives – April 2012 __________________ Wisdom is ofttimes nearer when we stoop than when we soar. – William […]

  30. Wow, apparently a walmart employee wrote the OCZ post.

    The Vertex 4 is slower then the vertex 3 in transferring data.

    Changing the controller has not paid off in real world applications.

    The consumer has turned into a clown, putting up with lies from the garbage Asus, and their failed Sata 3 marvell 9128, the joke of Intel building CPU’s for the outdated lga 1155.

    Seems not enough money has been made so the hardware has been shoved into reverse.

    What’s next for the fools, building systems on the LGA 775.

    The future is the entire point of upgrading not downgrading.

    The hardware industry needs a wake up call and needs to work on real Sata 3 controllers, building off the LGA 2011, and getting PCI-E 3.0 to actually work at 3.0 speed.

    Marvell the failures, the upgraded 9220, and 9230 are garbage.

    The 9128 and 9172 are absolute garbage and they should be sued for calling their junk Sata 3.

    Buy Asus and stay behind the times.

    Then we have Intel with Ivy Bridge, no real gains in per thread.

    Good thing the consumer just keeps buying garbage with no gains no real steps and using old hardware.

  31. @odiebugs: About the difference between the Vertex 3 and 4, yes, but it’s not quite that simple:
    http://www.anandtech.com/show/5719/ocz-vertex-4-review-256gb-512gb/3

  32. In the enterprise section you missed listing the latest generation for OCZ, which has been out since October of last year
    http://www.oczenterprise.com/ssd-products/z-drive-r4-c-series.html

  33. Thanks Bruce! An update to the enterprise section is long overdue. Thanks for the reminder.

  34. This ADATA SSD drive should be number 2 after the Intel and number 1 if you compare to the price.

  35. How often can we expect this list to be updated?
    There are often changes going on.

    Nice list btw..but it’s almost half a year out of date now. 😛

    Bård,
    Norway

  36. very informative..but i suggest adding corsair force gs to the list..its an upgraded version of corsair forc gt and its the fastest ssd that has been launched by corsair yet..the sandisk ultra also should be added

  37. Hello,
    We have RunCore SSD for our better server and there are no comparaison with HDD.
    We have buy our SSD on http://www.ipczeninformatique.fr for our good price.
    What is the best SSD with PCIE for animation computer ?

    What is the most important in SSD for have the best result in Photoshop?

    Thank you
    Laure

  38. @ADMIN, true, I do see nice gains in small R/W, 4k IOPS 120,000. Personally this drive is dependable and quick. Just in very large writes does it pace back a bit. A lot of people are having problems with some of the SSD’s, but they are mostly BIOS and windows problems that the consumer is blaming on the SSD. Now if Intel would stop crawling with the Ivy bridge-E so we can see the LGA 2011 to show its true colors, life would be better. If you update this review, you might have to add in the Corsair Force GS as top dog. Asus still putting that garbage Marvell 9128 on boards.

  39. http://www.eetimes.com/electronics-news/4397188/HP-Hynix-memristor-debut-pushed-back
    Another proof that they are just getting the most $$$ out of outdated technologies (especially NAND MLC).

  40. […] even close. He would be better not wasting the extra money for the 840 pro and going with an 830 SSD Ranking: The Fastest Solid State Drives – October 2012 […]

  41. Prices seem wrong. In most cases the high
    price is misleading since many sites HAD and
    have the highest capacity items for about 1/2
    the price shown.

    For example, you show:
    “2. OCZ Vertex 4
    Available Capacities: 128GB – 512GB
    Price: From $399.00 to $1,899”

    but the prices 512GB were generally in the
    high US$400’s to low US$500’s. (The
    highest price Froogle found on 12/22 was
    $712.49, but I don’t know the high price
    in the past.)

  42. Thanks for the catch Mark, this has to be changed ASAP.

  43. hi, i have seen the Samsung 840 Pro but u dindt put the diferent transference rates that varies about the capacity… do the samsung are the same rate in all the capacities?

    ty

  44. Excellent article. Thanks. Perhaps you can answer another question. What is the difference in speed and quality between the SanDisk “Extreme” series SSD and their “Ultra Plus” product? Thanks

  45. I’ve actually found that since the 1.5.1 firmware update for the OCZ Vertex 4 it has made is MUCH! Faster. The usual speeds I get from it are about 550MB/s read and about 490MB/a write. This making it the 2nd fastest drive in the market.

  46. I just want to say that I appreciate you guys making this website a lot. I am building a fast computer coming out of high school and I wanted to find the best SSD’s that I can run my favorite games and OS on. Using your site, I will be able to make my search for one component that much easier, which is nice when you have to search for a lot of them. XD

    Thanks again!

  47. It’s all very well posting these’s speeds for SATA 3 users. But what about all us SATA 2 users. We need to know the speed/s we will get on SATA 2 using SATA 3 drives as well. Also raid speeds would help to.

    So lets see some tests here.

    I have 2 Crucial C300s 128GB in raid. On SATA 2

    Read is around R 530 MB/s and W 260 MB/s.

    As a single drive set up, R 267 MB/s and W 140 MB/s

  48. Another failure, this time at processor market – it looks like Haswell is going to be slower than its predecessor in memory-intensive applications. Not to mention that its caches may be actually slower as well in such applications. Probably defect Xeons (socket 2011) are the only good alternative for upgrading

  49. I am genuinely thankful to the owner of this website who has shared this enormous article at at this time.

  50. Would be great of this list can be updated. Lots of new ssds have come out.

  51. Drive measurements need to be done more accurately!

    All SSD results today are largely exaggerated, because the measurements are done using assisted, rather than directly oriented test techniques.

    Show us the *real* numbers, kids.

    Here are some real Sandisk numbers.

    Sequential Read : 360.335 MB/s
    Sequential Write : 169.426 MB/s
    Random Read 512KB : 341.851 MB/s
    Random Write 512KB : 166.551 MB/s
    Random Read 4KB (QD=1) : 24.467 MB/s [ 5973.3 IOPS]
    Random Write 4KB (QD=1) : 35.268 MB/s [ 8610.5 IOPS]
    Random Read 4KB (QD=32) : 204.754 MB/s [ 49988.7 IOPS]
    Random Write 4KB (QD=32) : 124.776 MB/s [ 30463.0 IOPS]

    Much less than they claim.

  52. What about the samsung 840 evo? And is this not being updated Anymore?

  53. Can you list a date when this was last updated? I love the simplicity and comprehensiveness of this list, but shouldn’t newer drives (such as revodrive 350) be on this list?

  54. Very useful post. Wanted to know more about ssd drives and brands. Thanls

  55. Hi there, just asking the FusionIO ioDrive Octal, the PCLe, can you use more than one drive, am building a nice gaming rig and what about it’s price? Do they allow exports because am in Africa, Kenya.

  56. Does the hexabus Foremay EC188 D-Series need more than one PCLe port?

  57. Just asking? Can you install Windows 8.x on those pcle drives, they are said to be servers and am not sure I can play bio shock infinite on them ( I hope I can) and I think I will go for the ioDrive octal 10tb version. It has better specs. Can the Asus x99 deluxe motherboard support 4 of those drives? for the fun of I have been living with HHDs till last year, I didn’t know such powerful drives existed. Your page has been very eye opening for me, thank you.

  58. I know HPE uses both NVDIMM and NVMe in their servers. May I know which other companies use a combination of these ?

  59. I just chucked out three solid state drives for one 3tb no state drive couldn’t be happier. Though I wouldn’t run it with Windows, Windows can’t see anything above 2tb imagine that.

  60. Which SSDs do not have Garbage collection mechanisms. Juts want to avoid them.

  61. I see here old and SATA based SSD’s. Among fastest are PCIE SSD’s such as Samsung 960 and Patriot Hellfire. Look for highest random read speed for practical speed.

  62. Bought Samsung 950 Pro, unfortunatelly it does not support my HP EliteBook 840 G3 with Product Number: L3C67AV.

  63. I do not realize the relation between the Interface (sata ii, sata iii,, pci,..) and the sdd speed. Anybody could explain I would appreciate that. Other question which is a bit off-topic , is it more economical to buy an external ssd and use thunderbolt 3(usb c) rather buying a macbook with larger ssd and exponentially pricier device?!
    Thank you

  64. Hi Ashkan, sorry for the late reply. The interface is important because it is may cap the speed of an SSDs (not
    mechanical drives, which are too slow). For example, most recent SATA III (6 Gbps) SSDs are capped by the interface, which is why you need to move to PCI Express (PCIe) to see an improvement. To confuse things a bit further, PCIe can be in regular PCIe card form factor or the smaller, on-board M.2 (the latter of which may also use a SATA interface, not to be confused with mSATA).

  65. Fusion IO drive octal is faster and larger than all these drives. 6.7GB/s read 3.9GB/s write 10TB

  66. IntelRIP corsair win

  67. SSD does not have garbage collection mechanism.

  68. Its true that Samsung is the best when it comes to consumer SSDs. I am using Samsung 860 Evo in my PC and it makes the Windows 10 load in only 2 seconds.

  69. […] of tapes, however, achieves speeds of up to 750 MB/s and Flash-based  consumer drives like the Samsung 850 Pro or the SanDisk Extreme Pro already achieve speeds of 550 MB/s read and 520 MB/s write – which is more than double the speed […]

    Leave a reply